ARTICLE 13
Published in the Journal CEO IT
MICROBEHAVIOURS: THEIR IMPORTANCE IN MOTIVATING PEOPLE AND HIGH
PERFORMANCE
by Dr David Freemantle
Dr David Freemantle
was previously Director of Personnel of British Caledonian Airways.
He now runs a consultancy business specialising in leadership, motivation
and customer relations.
He is the author of fourteen business books which have been published
in 19 different languages.
His book HOW TO CHOOSE (How our greatest successes are a
reflection of the small everyday choices we make) was published
by Prentice Hall in 2002. Dr Freemantle can be contacted at: team@superboss.co.uk
Microbehaviours are the tiny behaviours that comprise any one big
behaviour. Thus making a telephone call is a big behaviour whilst
the tiny behaviours are for example the style of greeting, the tone
of voice, the choice of words, the time devoted to listening as
opposed to speaking and the responses given to the person the other
end. All these add up, along with a thousand other microbehaviours,
to influence the performance of a team. In other words a major factor
in the success of any business is the millions of microbehaviours
adopted by its managers and employees.
The examination of microbehaviours
will become a critical area of study for the HR profession as companies
dig deeper and deeper to discover the elusive connection between
people and performance.
There are two dimensions to any business: the impersonal and the
personal. The first is founded on systems and the second on psychology.
Under the auspices of scientific management there has been much
attention focused over the last few decades on the first - but at
the expense of the latter. Managers around the globe along with
their professional HR advisers have been seeking a 'system for success'
by which they can apply 'tools' to spark the motivation that brings
high performance.
These 'tools' come in the form of policies, procedures and personnel
systems such as 'objective setting', 'performance appraisal' 'team
briefings' and 'empowerment programmes'. There is a strongly held
belief that the application of these 'tools' will lead to high performance.
Thus strategic HR policies are adopted by which line managers are
trained and 'tasked' to use these 'tools' to enhance the performance
of their teams. Despite assertions to the contrary the role of the
manager in many companies is seen as one of managing tasks in order
to achieve quantified results. Managers assign people tasks and
then expect them to achieve the necessary results.
All this can be very impersonal for the simple reason that it is
'system' (or policy) driven. Much neglected is the psychology of
this process and especially an in-depth understanding of the role
of behaviours and (and what I will term) microbehaviours in the
execution of these tasks. It is truism to state that successful
businesses are built on relationships and by that I mean the personal
relationships managers have with employees as well as with customers,
suppliers, shareholders and the community at large. The better the
relationships an organisation (as represented by its managers) has
with these various groups the greater the probability of success.
Conversely a company that suffers poor relationships is likely to
lose business by losing its customers, employees and eventually
shareholders. A key factor in any relationship is the behaviours
adopted between the various parties involved. Behaviour determines
the effectiveness of the relationship which in turn determines the
effectiveness of the business. Behaviour is a topic that has been
much neglected in personnel management for the simple reason that
it is IMPOSSIBLE to manage other people's behaviour.
Behaviour is very personal and is a product of the inner soul of
each individual employee. When managers command people to behave
in a certain way they are effectively attempting to command the
souls of employees. When managers command people to behave in a
certain way they are effectively attempting to command the souls
of employees Thus a manager can instruct an employee to undertake
a task.
However what it is impossible to do is instruct an employee on the
behaviour he or she should adopt to undertake this task. At best
the manager can advise or suggest. For example you cannot instruct
employees to smile at a customer. At best you can advise them to
do so. Behaviour is at the core of high performance
My central thesis is that high performance is not a just a function
of the tasks and skills of employees in pursuing a desired objective
but more importantly a function of the behaviours they adopt in
carrying out these tasks and applying their skills. Expressed another
way, behaviour is at the core of high performance.
This begs a question of what we mean by behaviour. The word 'behaviour'
is bandied around and used very loosely. We assume we know what
'behaviour' is but I suspect many HR professionals have widely differing
interpretations of the word. We know for example that good behaviour
is 'writing a thank-you letter' whilst bad behaviour is 'swearing
at a boss'.
To understand behaviour it is thus necessary to differentiate between
macrobehaviours and microbehaviours. Macrobehaviours are the steps
that individual takes in pursuing a given objective, for example
meeting a customer, walking the patch, or staying late to clear
a backlog of work.
Microbehaviours are the minutiae of movements that comprise a macrobehaviour.
For example a microbehavioural choice is whether or not to call
a customer by her name, whether to use the title or the first name
and then how frequently to use that name.
When walking the patch the microbehavioural choice is who to talk
to, what to say, who to listen to and who to ignore. Using the example
of the macrobehaviour in the previous paragraph ('writing a thank-you
letter) microbehaviours are all the minute tiny behaviours that
go into this - for example whether or not to handwrite the letter,
how to sign the letter, how to introduce the letter, what emotions
to display in the words used and so on.
These choices of macrobehaviours and microbehaviours have a critical
impact on the performance of any business and can never be determined
by head office edict or the commands of senior management.
Thus how employees seek to interpret a policy, and the behaviours
they choose in doing so is as vital to future success as the policy
itself.
What managers do at 9.00 a.m. on a Monday morning will influence
the performance of their teams Similarly what managers do at 9.00
a.m. on a Monday morning will influence the performance of their
teams. The choices of macro- and microbehaviours available to them
are infinite.
Here are just a few for example: At 9.00 a.m. on a Monday morning
managers can...... ......leave their doors open ......shut their
doors open ......spend 5,10, 20, 30 or 60 minutes 'walking the patch'
......choose to speak to certain people but not others ......choose
what they say to people ......choose what questions to ask (personal
or business) ......choose who to listen to and whether or not to
take advice ......check their e-mails ......make a few calls ......read
the newspaper ......prepare for the first meeting of the day ......go
into the first meeting of the day In fact the list is endless.
Even the top HR expert in the world could not prescribe the most
effective pattern of microbehaviours to be adopted by a manager
in any given circumstance at 9.00 a.m. on a Monday. Yet a manager's
choice of these microbehaviours will largely influence the effectiveness
and performance of their teams.
Why is it that in one organisation I studied recently one team consistently
achieved higher customer satisfaction ratings than all others teams
and also why is it that this team had a much lower staff attrition
rate than the others? The organisation was the same as were the
personnel policies that applied.
The only difference was the manager and the way he behaved with
his team compared with other managers. The microbehaviours of this
particular manager influenced the microbehaviours of every single
member of the team. They loved him because all his microbehaviours
demonstrated that he loved them. Thus they loved what they did and
equally so loved their customers.
These microbehaviours (for example the frequent spontaneous celebration
of minor successes) emanated from their hearts and related to how
they felt about their boss, their customers and their work. They
did not emanate from HR policy, company vision or core values. It
is much easier for a manager to manage tasks than behaviour It is
all too easy for personnel professionals to concentrate on the impersonal
side of the profession by focusing on strategies, plans, policies,
systems and procedures for 'getting the people thing right'.
Similarly it is much easier for a manager to manage tasks than behaviour.
Tasks come in the form of paperwork, e-mails, meetings, analyses,
numbers, targets, reports and proposals. The behavioural side is
much too complex and defies definitions that can be encapsulated
in papers to the board.
The study of microbehaviours will make it even more complex, given
the millions of potential tiny behaviours that can have an impact
on performance.
At best HR professionals talk of 'attitudinal change' and 'culture
change programmes'. Even then it is relatively easy to come up with
values statements that say "we believe in open and honest relationships
with our employees" and then devise a 'system' of regular team briefings
to enhance communication.
However the effectiveness of this policy and of the application
through team briefings will depend on the myriad of microbehaviours
adopted by each manager. In this case the team will judge a manager
not by the content of the team briefing (which is often prescribed
by Head Office) but by the broad range of microbehaviours used to
implement the briefing.
A frown, a disinterested look, a negative gesture, a rushed approach,
garbled words, a failure to listen are all examples of microbehaviours
which in time aggregate to form an overall behavioural pattern which
will have a negative influence on the team and thus performance.
These microbehaviours are choices managers and employees make to
reflect the innermost workings of their hearts and souls. In other
words to achieve high performance it is necessary to go beyond the
definition of the strategy, the implementation of the plan, the
undertaking of the task, the monitoring of the results and take
a constructively critical look at the patterns of microbehaviours
managers and employees adopt and which influence the implementation
of the plan, the application of the task and the accomplishment
of a final outcome.
However whilst managers can look at the microbehaviours of individuals
in their teams what they cannot do is 'manage' the microbehaviours
of these people. At best they can influence employees and help them
develop more effective microbehaviours. Furthermore they can look
critically at their own microbehaviours and choose to improve their
own approach. Thus if a manager chooses to be happy, to joke and
to smile this might have a positive impact on the team - whilst
if a manager chooses to frown, to say 'no' to whatever suggestion
comes his way and to give people little time then this might have
a negative impact on the team. There is no certainty about this.
Where managers need help from the HR profession is in developing
an awareness of their own microbehaviours and how these impact the
business. It means helping managers and employees push back boundaries
to go beyond habit and routine and adopt new behaviours which might
just have a more positive impact.
A Starbucks employee commented "I do like the tie you are wearing
today". You cannot have a policy instructing employees to adopt
microbehaviours such as these which make the customer feel special
For example, the other day I was sitting in a Starbucks in Millennia
Walk, Singapore, reading a paper and drinking a caffe latte.
As I frequently visit Singapore I am a regular at this particular
Starbucks and I know the 'partners' there quite well. One of them
passed me by to clean the next table. She glanced at me and said "I do like the tie you are wearing today". This simple comment really
made me good, it perked me up for the day. Then I thought.
She did not have to say this. In fact in twenty years of sitting
around in caf?s and restaurants I cannot remember the last time
a waiter or waitress made such a comment to me. What this waitress
did was adopt a small microbehaviour (nine words to compliment a
customer). No wonder this particular Starbucks has just been given
the award for the best Starbucks in Singapore for customer service.
Yet Starbucks (or any company for that matter) could not have a
policy which states "you must comment on customers' ties". Because
microbehaviours are so small they often go unnoticed by managers
and to that extent they are largely neglected in the debate on how
to achieve high performance. Yet my assertion, and this is the subject
of my book HOW TO CHOOSE is that it is these microbehaviours which
are critical in determining the success or failure of any business.
To be successful requires choosing successful microbehaviours.
Over time these microbehaviours aggregate and evolve into a perceived
pattern which can be linked to success or failure. The theory of
'emergence' is particularly apt here. First we have to understand
our own microbehaviours and how these emerge into traits and outcomes
upon which people judge us.
As much of our behaviour is driven by our subconscious we need to
become conscious of our existing patterns of microbehaviours. In
doing do we can then determine whether there are more effective
microbehaviours we can adopt which enhance the probability of attaining
the outcomes we desire.
The connection between microbehaviours and performance requires
much further debate and the HR profession will have a vital role
in this. The purpose of my book (and this article) is to stimulate
that debate.
© Dr David Freemantle, Superboss Ltd, P O Box 813, Windsor SL4 2XU
Tel: 01753 833226; Fax: 01753 863412; e-mail: team@superboss.co.uk
alike.
| |
THE
STIMULUS CLINIC
Each month Dr Freemantle
answers a question put to him by readers. The following question
has been raised by quite a few people.
Q:
Given that you run training seminars is it really possible
to 'train' people to add emotional value and develop empathy?
Dr David Freemantle replies:
Dr David Freemantle
replies:
A:
It depends on the style of training. Too much modern day training
is 'prescriptive'. It provides a prescription (dictated by
the bosses) for what people must do and then attempts to programme
their minds and behaviours to do it. That is not my style
and I am not convinced it is effective. I believe training
should be stimulating and it should stimulate people to find
a better way. In doing so they will be stimulated by the seminar
leader to examine their own hearts as to whether or not they
are adding emotional value in their relationships with others.
Hopefully they will be stimulated to do so, but ultimately
it is their personal choice.
Should you have a question for Dr Freemantle's
STIMMULUS CLINIC please e-mail him at: team@superboss.co.uk
He will do his best to reply personally. One question will
be chosen every |
| |
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: DR
DAVID FREEMANTLE
Dr David Freemantle is
one of the world's leading experts on customer service and motivation.
He has written fourteen best-selling business books including the
widely acclaimed "What customers like about you" and more recently
"The Stimulus Factor", "The BUZZ" and "The BIZ" . These books are based on his extensive research
worldwide.
He is based in Windsor
UK where he lives with his Venezuelan wife Mechi and two children
Ruth-Elena and Linnet. He welcomes contact by e-mail from readers
(e-mail address as above).
ARTICLE COPYRIGHT © Dr
David Freemantle
|